“The water depth on the scene is over 1,000 meters [3,300 feet]making it extraordinarily tough to hold out salvage works, “learn the assertion.
However on Thursday, going through stress from authorities to reveal the circumstances surrounding the obvious wreckage, the vessel’s proprietor, Aberdeen Restaurant Enterprises Restricted, mentioned in a press release the vessel and its accompanying tugboat had been nonetheless in waters close to the Paracel Islands (often called the Xisha Islands in China).
The assertion, offered to the Hong Kong authorities, didn’t point out whether or not the vessel was nonetheless afloat, or if it had turn out to be separated from its tugboat.
The obvious shift in messaging follows a request from Hong Kong’s Marine Division for the restaurant group to supply a written report into the incident as a part of an preliminary investigation.
A spokesman for Aberdeen Restaurant Enterprises Restricted instructed CNN on Friday it had at all times used the time period “capsize” to explain the incident and had by no means claimed the vessel had sunk.
Requested whether or not this contradicted earlier statements, the spokesman mentioned the agency was required “to report the depth of the waters the place (the incident) passed off,” and declined to reply whether or not this meant the vessel was salvageable or remained afloat.
A principal Hong Kong vacationer attraction, the restaurant had offered a backdrop for quite a few motion pictures, together with “Enter the Dragon” starring Bruce Lee, and “James Bond: The Man with the Golden Gun.” It additionally hosted visiting luminaries together with Queen Elizabeth II, Jimmy Carter and Tom Cruise.
A number of proposals had been put ahead to save lots of the restaurant, however its excessive upkeep value had deterred potential buyers, with Hong Kong Chief Govt Carrie Lam additionally ruling out a possible authorities bailout to save lots of the attraction.
The boat was towed away from Hong Kong on June 14, after almost half a century moored within the nation southwest waters.
Though the homeowners initially declined to state its meant location, it was later revealed by the Marine Division that it was as a consequence of be taken to a shipyard in Cambodia.
Information of its sinking had been met with consternation on-line, with many Hong Kong social media customers bemoaning the inelegant finish to one of many world most acknowledged historic icons.
Tourism lawmaker Perry Yiu Pak-leung mentioned Jumbo Kingdom’s sinking was a loss for the nation heritage.
“Hong Kong ought to take this as a lesson. The federal government, conservationists, historians and the business sector ought to be working collectively to guard and make good use of those [historic] websites, “he mentioned.” We stalled too lengthy. “
Requires an investigation
Hong Kong lawmakers are actually calling on the federal government to launch a extra thorough investigation.
“We have to know if the tug boat firm had been concerned in any malpractice or human error at sea once they towed away the Jumbo Kingdom vessel,” mentioned Tik Chi-yuen, chairman of the Third Facet political get together.
Stephen Li, a professor on the Hong Kong Polytechnic College’s Division of Logistics and Maritime Research, mentioned it was “fairly unusual” for a vessel to sink merely as a consequence of unhealthy climate, including that sea transport is “very protected lately” given developments in navigation expertise.
However an investigation might take years, mentioned Li, particularly because it occurred exterior of the nation jurisdiction in worldwide waters.
The Marine Division mentioned in a press release on Wednesday that the ship proprietor had employed an company to examine the vessel and made certain it was seaworthy earlier than being towed.
It’s not clear whether or not the vessel was insured, doubtlessly complicating any salvage operations.
Andrew Brooker, managing director of Hong Kong-based marine insurance coverage agency Latitude Brokers, mentioned it was “extremely unlikely” the vessel was insured for loss or harm.
“The marine insurance coverage market doesn’t like [to carry the risk of] “50-year-old barges being towed throughout 1,000 kilometers of open ocean in storm season,” he mentioned.
Brooker added that Jumbo Kingdom’s homeowners wouldn’t have been legally required to insure the vessel exterior of Hong Kong waters.
CNN’s Maggie Hiufu Wong and Jessie Yeung contributed reporting.